U.S. Press Freedom Tracker

Nevada judge briefly restricts media coverage of high-profile trial

Incident details

Date of incident
January 13, 2026
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Targets
Media

Prior Restraint

Status of prior restraint
Dropped
Mistakenly released materials?
No
AP PHOTO/TY ONEIL

Judge Jessica Peterson, right, briefly imposed restrictions on media coverage of the sexual assault trial of actor Nathan Chasing Horse, left, on Jan. 13, 2026, in Las Vegas, Nevada. She reversed course the next day.

— AP PHOTO/TY ONEIL
January 13, 2026

A Nevada judge imposed restrictions on media coverage in a prominent sexual assault trial in Las Vegas on Jan. 13, 2026, before modifying the order after objections from the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

The initial decision occurred as reporters prepared to cover the high-profile case of Nathan Chasing Horse, an actor who appeared in the 1990 movie “Dances with Wolves.” He is accused of sexually assaulting multiple women in the Native American community under the guise of his role as a self-proclaimed spiritual leader and healer.

Clark County District Judge Jessica Peterson issued a decorum order that barred interviews with witnesses or other parties at the courthouse while the trial is underway. It restricted the media from publishing any identifying information about victims without permission and about a police officer who was testifying.

Later that day, Review-Journal attorney Benjamin Lipman sent a letter to the court arguing the restrictions violated the First Amendment and amounted to an unconstitutional prior restraint.

“Attending court proceedings is a constitutional right, not a mere privilege,” the letter said.

The next day, Peterson issued a revised decorum order removing the interview prohibition and narrowing the publication restrictions.

In a statement, the judge said her order had been used by the district court previously without issue, but that she decided that provisions challenged by the news organization could be seen as overly broad, the Review-Journal reported.

The amended order now allows media interviews so long as jurors cannot overhear them and witnesses do not discuss their testimony.

The U.S. Press Freedom Tracker catalogs press freedom violations in the United States. Email tips to [email protected].