Journalist arrested while covering North Carolina homeless camp eviction

The trespassing conviction against journalists Veronica Coit and Matilda Bliss of The Asheville Blade was affirmed on Feb. 19, 2025, by a North Carolina appeals court, according to court documents reviewed by the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker.

Coit and Bliss were arrested while documenting the police sweep of a homeless encampment in Asheville in December 2021 and charged with trespassing. A judge found both journalists guilty in April 2023; the journalists appealed and were convicted at a June 2023 jury trial.

In February 2024, the journalists appealed the conviction, arguing that their reporting activities were protected by the First Amendment and that the lower court had prejudiced the jurors by instructing them not to consider the First Amendment, or that Bliss and Coit were reporting at the time of the arrest.

A year later, the appeals court ruled that the case record lacked information about the original district court case against the journalists, which they had previously appealed to a superior court.

“Without the necessary records and information from the district court proceedings, we are unable to determine whether the superior court had jurisdiction,” the court ruled, dismissing the appeal.

Bliss told Freedom of the Press Foundation, of which the Tracker is a project, that her attorneys plan to file a motion for reconsideration.

In the meantime, Bliss and Coit’s federal lawsuit against the city of Asheville and the police officers who arrested them for constitutional violations is ongoing.

Journalists Veronica Coit and Matilda Bliss, along with their outlet The Asheville Blade, filed a federal lawsuit on Dec. 23, 2024, against the city of Asheville, North Carolina, and the police officers who arrested them there in 2021.

Coit and Bliss were documenting a homeless encampment sweep when they were arrested for trespassing. Asheville Police Department officers seized a cellphone from Bliss; nearly a month later, detectives obtained a warrant to search the phone as part of an investigation into one of the protesters also arrested during the sweep.

A judge found both journalists guilty of trespassing in April 2023; the journalists appealed and were convicted at a June 2023 jury trial. Their appeal of that ruling is pending.

The journalists’ federal suit argues that their arrest, as well as the retention of the cellphone for nearly a month without a warrant, lacked probable cause and violated their First, Fourth and Fourteenth amendment rights and the state constitution.

The journalists argue that the city and its police chief failed to adequately train its officers, twelve of whom are also defendants in the case, and that the reporters were targeted in retaliation for their past coverage of the police.

The arrests and subsequent charges caused both journalists emotional distress and economic losses for them and the Blade, according to the complaint.

The filing requests permanent injunctions against the city and the police chief preventing them from arresting Blade journalists “solely because they remain on public property for the purpose of recording police activity and/or newsgathering.” It also would require the city to provide adequate training to police officers on journalists’ rights.

Journalists Veronica Coit and Matilda Bliss of The Asheville Blade appealed their trespassing conviction on March 22, 2024, according to court documents reviewed by the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker and a statement issued by the Blade.

Coit and Bliss were arrested while documenting a homeless encampment sweep by police in Asheville, North Carolina, in December 2021, and charged with trespassing. A judge found both guilty in April 2023; the journalists appealed, asking for a jury trial, which was held in June 2023.

The jurors were reportedly instructed not to consider the constitutionality of the charges against Coit and Bliss and found them guilty. The journalists were each sentenced to a fine of $100 plus court costs.

The journalists notified the court that they intended to appeal immediately after the verdict, and filed an appellants’ brief in March 2024. They argue that their reporting activities were protected by the First Amendment and that the lower court had prejudiced the jurors by instructing them not to consider the First Amendment, or that Coit and Bliss were reporting at the time of the arrest. “The convictions of Bliss and Coit are a dangerous step toward the evisceration of freedom of the press in North Carolina,” the brief added.

Freedom of the Press Foundation, which manages the day-to-day operations of the Tracker, has led a coalition of media organizations and press freedom groups demanding that the charges be dropped. FPF Deputy Director of Advocacy Caitlin Vogus underlined the importance of the appeal, writing that the appeals court’s decision “will impact not only Coit and Bliss but all journalists in the state who cover protests, police, or other activities on public land.”

Bliss confirmed by email to the Tracker that students and attorneys at Duke University School of Law’s First Amendment Clinic had joined the journalists’ attorneys for the appeal, and that the appeal proceedings could take months.

“We will fight for as long as it takes,” Bliss said. “The repercussions of quitting are far too dire for press freedom and by extension the public’s right to know what’s happening in their communities.”

Asheville Blade reporter Veronica Coit was found guilty of trespassing by a jury, along with fellow reporter Matilda Bliss, during a five-day trial that ended on June 16, 2023.

The journalists were arrested while documenting a homeless encampment sweep by police in Asheville, North Carolina, on Dec. 25, 2021, and were charged with second-degree trespassing.

After multiple trial delays, a judge found Bliss and Coit guilty on April 12, 2023. Both were ordered to pay a $25 fine and court costs, while Coit was additionally sentenced to a 10-day suspended prison sentence and one year of probation.

Their attorney filed an appeal asking that the case be heard by a jury and the sentences were held pending the outcome of the retrial, which began on June 12.

On June 16, the jury found both Bliss and Coit guilty, according to Bliss. She told Freedom of the Press Foundation, which manages the day-to-day operations of the Tracker, they were each sentenced to a fine of $100 plus court costs. The Asheville Citizen Times reported that their defense attorney entered a notice of appeal for both cases immediately after the verdict.

According to an earlier account in the Citizen Times, the judge reportedly instructed the jury not to consider the constitutionality of the charges against Coit and Bliss and had not decided their motion to dismiss under the First Amendment. Before the jury convened, the judge indicated orally that he was going to deny the motion and issue a written ruling to that effect later.

FPF has led a coalition of media organizations and press freedom groups demanding the charges be dropped. In a statement, FPF Advocacy Director Seth Stern said the verdict was disturbing and called it a loss for the people of Asheville.

“They gain absolutely nothing from their government weaponizing trespassing laws to punish journalists for doing their jobs,” Stern said.

Editor’s Note: This article has been updated with additional details following the verdict.

Asheville Blade reporters Matilda Bliss and Veronica Coit, who were found guilty of trespassing during an April bench trial, are now scheduled to appear for a jury trial on June 12, 2023, after the case was rescheduled to allow time for discovery.

Blade Editor David Forbes told the Freedom of the Press Foundation in early May that the journalists, unbeknownst to them, had been placed on a “City Park Ban List” following their December 2021 arrests. They were barred from entering city parks in Asheville, North Carolina, for one year, with “Camping in Aston Park refused to leave” listed as the justification. Bliss told the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker that by the time they learned of the ban it had already lapsed.

According to the ban list, reviewed by the Tracker, more than a dozen others arrested during the Dec. 25 encampment sweep were barred from Asheville parks for three years. The ACLU of North Carolina filed a lawsuit on behalf of some of those individuals on April 18.

Asheville Blade reporters Veronica Coit and Matilda Bliss were convicted on second degree trespassing charges on April 19, 2023, stemming from their arrests while documenting a homeless encampment sweep in Asheville, North Carolina, nearly 16 months prior.

According to Shadowproof, both journalists were ordered to pay a $25 fine and court costs, while Coit was additionally sentenced to a 10-day suspended prison sentence and one year of probation.

The Blade reported the decision on Twitter, writing that the judge ignored the press freedom arguments made in the journalists’ defense and “openly” sided with the Asheville Police Department’s assertion that the press had no right to remain in the park after curfew.

“Every reporter, everyone who's ever criticized any official or cop should find the push to punish our journalists chilling,” the Blade wrote.

The attorney representing Coit and Bliss immediately filed an appeal for the case to be heard before a jury trial, the Blade reported. Blade Editor David Forbes told the Freedom of the Press Foundation that the trial is currently scheduled for May 1 and that the sentences are on hold pending the results of that appeal.

After nearly a year of continuances, the pair was originally set to stand before a judge for a bench trial in September 2022 — that hearing was delayed until January 2023 before being postponed yet again.

NC Newsline investigative reporter Kelan Lyons, who was live-tweeting the trial from Asheville, wrote that Buncombe County Chief District Judge Calvin Hill said that there was no evidence presented to the court that the pair are journalists. Hill offered the reporters the option of asking for judgment to be withheld, which would prevent them from having a criminal record, but they declined.

Bliss told Lyons that the case has consequences for journalism across the country. “We’re going to fight this to the end,” Bliss said.

Editor’s Note: This article has been updated with details of the journalists’ pending sentences.