Man upset with newspaper coverage shoots and kills multiple journalists in Capital Gazette newsroom
On June 28, 2018, a man armed with a shotgun entered the Capital Gazette newsroom in Annapolis, Maryland, and shot multiple journalists and other media workers, the Baltimore Sun reports. Five people, including four journalists, were killed in the attack, and two others were injured. Police later identified the suspected shooter as Jarrod Ramos, who had previously sued the Capital Gazette for defamation.
The shooting is the most deadly attack on journalists in the United States since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.
Anne Arundel County police said that five Capital Gazette employees — four journalists and one business-side staffer — were killed in the attack:
- Rob Hiaasen, columnist and assistant editor
- Gerald Fischman, editorial page editor
- John McNamara, community news and sports reporter
- Wendi Winters, community news reporter and columnist
- Rebecca Smith, advertising sales assistant
Two other Capital Gazette employees, whose names were not released, were injured in the attack.
The shooting occurred on June 28 inside the Capital Gazette newsroom, which is located on the ground floor of an office building in Annapolis, Maryland. The newsroom is home to reporters for both The Capital, a daily newspaper covering Annapolis, and The Maryland Gazette, a twice-weekly paper focused on state news.
Phil Davis, a crime reporter for The Capital who was inside the newsroom during the shooting, told the Sun that he saw multiple colleagues shot. He said the scene inside the newsroom “was like a war zone.” In a series of powerful tweets, he described what he witnessed.
A single shooter shot multiple people at my office, some of whom are dead.— Phil Davis (@PhilDavis_CG) June 28, 2018
Gunman shot through the glass door to the office and opened fire on multiple employees. Can't say much more and don't want to declare anyone dead, but it's bad.— Phil Davis (@PhilDavis_CG) June 28, 2018
There is nothing more terrifying than hearing multiple people get shot while you're under your desk and then hear the gunman reload— Phil Davis (@PhilDavis_CG) June 28, 2018
Jarrod Ramos, the suspect in the shooting, had threatened and harassed Capital Gazette staffers for years, according to the Sun.
It began in July 2011, when Capital columnist Eric Hartley wrote about how Ramos was charged with harassment after stalking and threatening a high school classmate online. In response to Hartley’s column, Ramos waged a one-man war against him and the paper. (Hartley has since left The Capital for The Virginian-Pilot, and Marquardt has retired.)
In July 2012, he filed a defamation lawsuit against Hartley, Capital Gazette Communications, and The Capital editor and publisher Tom Marquardt. Ramos represented himself in the suit, which was filed in Prince George’s County, Maryland. At a March 2013 court hearing, a judge dismissed Ramos’ complaint with prejudice and tried to explain to Ramos why the article was not defamatory:
You know, I understand exactly how you feel. I think people who are the subject of newspaper articles, whoever they may be, feel that there is a requirement that they be placed in the best light, or they have an opportunity to have the story reported to their satisfaction, or have the opportunity to have however much input they believe is appropriate.
But that's simply not true. There is nothing in those complaints that prove that anything that was published about you is, in fact, false. It all came from a public record. It was of the result of a criminal conviction. And it cannot give rise to a defamation suit.
Transcript of March 29, 2013 motion hearing
Ramos appealed the judge’s decision. The Maryland Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s dismissal of the case and ordered Ramos to pay Capital Gazette’s legal fees. In an unpublished opinion, one of the appellate court judges wrote that “a discussion of defamation law would be an exercise in futility, because the appellant [Ramos] fails to come close to alleging a case of defamation,” and sharply criticized Ramos for bringing the lawsuit:
The appellant is pro se. A lawyer would almost certainly have told him not to proceed with this case. It reveals a fundamental failure to understand what defamation law is and, more particularly, what defamation law is not. The appellant is aggrieved because the newspaper story about his guilty plea assumed that he was guilty and that the guilty plea was, therefore, properly accepted. He is aggrieved because the story was sympathetic toward the harassment victim and was not equally understanding of the harassment perpetrator. The appellant wanted equal coverage of his side of the story. He wanted a chance to put the victim in a bad light, in order to justify and explain why he did what he did. That, however, is not the function of defamation law.
The appellant was charged with a criminal act. The appellant perpetrated a criminal act. The appellant plead guilty to having perpetrated a criminal act. The appellant was punished for his criminal act. He is not entitled to equal sympathy with his victim and may not blithely dismiss her as a "bipolar drunkard." He does not appear to have learned his lesson.
Unpublished appellate opinion
Ramos then tried to appeal to the state’s highest court, the Maryland Court of Appeals, which declined to hear his case.
Ramos also harassed The Capital and its reporters outside of the courtroom.
According to the Sun, a Twitter account in Ramos’ name (which has since been suspended), tweeted threats against The Capital. The account, which has since been suspended, included photographs of Hartley and Marquardt, and alluded to the mass shooting of journalists.
Marquardt, who served as The Capital’s editor and publisher until 2012, told the Sun that he had been concerned about Ramos’ obsessive hatred of the paper and whether it could escalate into violence.
“I was seriously concerned he would threaten us with physical violence,” he told the Sun. “I even told my wife, ‘We have to be concerned. This guy could really hurt us.’ … I remember telling our attorneys, ‘This is a guy who is going to come in and shoot us.’”
Marquardt told the Los Angeles Times that when he notified the Anne Arundel County police about Ramos’ harassment back in 2013, the police said they could not arrest him for his behavior toward the newspaper. Marquardt said that the paper considered getting a restraining order against Ramos but worried about how Ramos would react.
“The theory back then was, ‘Let’s not infuriate him more than I have to.… The more you agitate this guy, the worse it’s gonna get,’” he told the Los Angeles Times.
William Shirley, an attorney who helped defend Capital Gazette against Ramos’ defamation suit, told the New York Daily News that Ramos threatened during a court hearing to assault Capital journalists.
“I remember at one point he was talking in a motion and somehow worked in how he wanted to smash Hartley’s face into the concrete,” Shirley said. “We were concerned at the time. He was not stable.”
On June 29, the day after the shooting, Ramos was charged with five counts of first-degree murder.
In the aftermath of the attack, Capital Gazette journalists worked with colleagues at the Sun to ensure that the next day’s paper would still be published.
Yes, we’re putting out a damn paper tomorrow. https://t.co/ScNvIK1A4R— Capital Gazette (@capgaznews) June 29, 2018
The June 29 edition of The Capital includes a front-page story about the shooting, bylined by 10 Capital reporters, and obituaries for all five of the people killed in the shooting. The opinion page of the paper is empty, except for a single message: “Today, we are speechless … Tomorrow this page will return to its steady purpose of offering our readers informed opinion about the world around them, that they might be better citizens.”