U.S. Press Freedom Tracker

Tech journalist subpoenaed in ongoing bitcoin lawsuit

Incident Details

Date of Incident
August 27, 2019
Location
Miami, Florida

Subpoena/Legal Order

Legal Orders
Legal Order Target
Institution
Legal Order Venue
Federal
SCREENSHOT

A portion of a subpoena received by journalist Brendan Sullivan on Aug. 27, 2019, for documents and testimony related to his interviews with Craig Wright, a computer scientist who claimed to be the creator of bitcoin.

— SCREENSHOT
November 13, 2020 - Update

Parties in crypto suit drop subpoena of journalist

A subpoena of journalist Brendan Sullivan for documents and testimony in a federal suit over cryptocurrency holdings was effectively dropped in November 2020 when the parties indicated that Sullivan’s motion to quash it was no longer relevant to the case, according to court filings reviewed by the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker.

In August 2019, Sullivan conducted an interview with Craig Wright, an Australian computer scientist and business owner who claimed to be the creator of bitcoin. The interview addressed an ongoing lawsuit against him by the estate of David Kleiman, Wright’s late business partner, in which Kleiman’s brother claimed that Wright had attempted to steal Kleiman’s bitcoin holdings.

Sullivan then received a subpoena to testify, as well as for all documents and communications between him and Wright. He refused to comply and filed a motion to quash the subpoena, but included an affidavit stating that his August article about the Wright interview accurately reflected their conversation.

In December, Kleiman’s attorneys filed an opposition to Sullivan’s motion to quash, indicating that the subpoena had been narrowed to request only that Sullivan confirm in a deposition that Wright had made the statements attributed to him in the article and that he produce a recording of the interview.

Kleiman’s attorneys also complained that Sullivan had attempted to “turn this process into a sideshow” by tweeting an excerpt of the requested video interview of Wright with the audio replaced by singer Rick Astley’s “Never Gonna Give You Up,” an internet joke referred to as “Rickrolling.”

But in November 2020, the parties confirmed to the court that “Brendan Sullivan’s previously filed motion to quash is now moot,” indicating that they no longer sought his testimony or documents. The court accordingly denied the motion as moot. Additional court records indicate that Sullivan was never deposed.

In March 2022, a judgment was entered in favor of Kleiman’s estate; Wright was ordered to pay $100 million plus interest.

In July 2024, Sullivan confirmed to the Tracker via email that he never complied with the subpoena. “Death before dishonor!” he wrote. “I never turned over a thing.”

Sullivan’s attorney also told the Tracker via email in July 2024 that the motion to quash became moot because the Court did not rule on it before the discovery phase of the case closed, and the plaintiff used up his allotted number of depositions on other witnesses.

Editor's Note: The incident data associated with this report has been updated to reflect that the subpoena had originally sought Sullivan's testimony, as well as documents and communications.

August 27, 2019

Brendan Sullivan, a journalist at Modern Consensus, received a subpoena for all documents and communications between him and Craig Wright, an Australian computer scientist and businessman who has claimed to be the creator of bitcoin.

Wright is currently the defendant in a lawsuit brought against him by the estate of David Kleiman, Wright’s late partner. David’s brother, Ira Kleiman, is the executor of the estate and claims Wright attempted to steal his brother’s bitcoin holdings, now worth approximately $10 billion.

Wright agreed to an interview with Sullivan, giving him a scoop on the case before the courts made an announcement of the judge's order. The next day, on Aug. 27, 2019, someone was waiting outside of Sullivan’s home to serve him the subpoena, according to his article outlining the events.

The U.S. Press Freedom Tracker reviewed the subpoena, which Sullivan posted with his article. It orders him to hand over any documents and communications between him and Wright since 2006 (before bitcoin was invented), listing out more than 110 items that count as “documents,” including their encrypted WhatsApp and Signal messages, every social media conversation, interview notes and transcripts, drafts of his article and any relevant documents protected by computer encryption.

“I’m a journalist and the court has no right to any of my files, notes, thoughts or personal belongings. They are not getting anything from me,” Sullivan wrote.

Sullivan told the Tracker that he refused to attend the deposition hearing scheduled for Sept. 10. His lawyer filed a motion to quash on Sept. 9, arguing that the breadth of documents requested suggests that the subpoena is a fishing expedition with no clear idea how, if at all, the documents are relevant to the case.

The filing also included an affidavit from Sullivan authenticating his article and stating that it truly and accurately reflects his interview with Wright. In addition to asking that the subpoena be quashed, they are asking for Kleiman to cover Sullivan’s legal fees.

“I can fight this for years if I need to,” Sullivan told the Tracker. “What I really want is just to have my press freedom back.”

On Sept. 20, a judge granted Kleiman’s attorney a 21-day extension to respond to the motion to quash the subpoena against Sullivan. In a joint filling from Wright and Kleiman they state, “The parties have been engaged in extensive settlement negotiations and have reached a non-binding agreement in principle to settle this matter.”

If a settlement is reached, Sullivan told the Tracker, it is likely that the subpoena against him would be dropped.

The U.S. Press Freedom Tracker catalogues press freedom violations in the United States. Email tips to [email protected].