Incident details
- Updated on
- Date of incident
- January 5, 2019
- Location
- San Diego, California
- Targets
- Mark Abramson (Freelance)
- Case number
- 1:19-cv-06570
- Case status
- Settled
- Type of case
- Civil
- Border point
- San Ysidro Port of Entry
- Target nationality
- US citizenship status of target
- U.S. citizen
- Denied entry?
- No
- Stopped previously?
- No
- Asked for device access?
- No
- Asked intrusive questions about work?
- Yes
Border Stop
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer watches a group of migrants from Central America seeking asylum as they search for a place to cross over the U.S. border wall in Tijuana, Mexico, in December 2018.
Journalists settle suit against DHS over border stops
A group of journalists who sued the government over border officers’ questioning of journalists about their work settled the suit on Jan. 26, 2026, in New York, New York, federal court, according to court documents reviewed by the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker.
Journalists Mark Abramson, Kitra Cahana, Ariana Drehsler, Bing Guan and Go Nakamura sued in November 2019 after a series of border stops in late 2018 and early 2019, during which all five were asked intrusive questions about their coverage of a Central American migrant caravan’s arrival in Mexico. Three had equipment searched by border officers.
The suit accused the government of violating the First Amendment and named the heads of the Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement as defendants. The complaint notes that pictures of all five journalists appear in a DHS compilation of journalists, activists and attorneys connected to the migrant caravan.
The American Civil Liberties Union, which represented the plaintiffs along with law firm Covington & Burling, announced that the settlement required CBP to “issue guidance to certain CBP units regarding the First Amendment and Privacy Act protections that apply when questioning journalists at the border,” and to act “to ensure that the journalists’ past reporting at the U.S.-Mexico border should not serve as a basis for future border questioning.”
The settlement also includes “an amount for costs and attorneys’ fees.” ACLU attorney Esha Bhandari declined to provide additional information about the settlement terms.
“We are thankful to have secured redress for these journalists, to allow them to do their jobs reporting on the news free from unjustified government scrutiny,” Bhandari said.
Guan said: “It’s clear the government’s actions were meant to instill fear in journalists like me, to cow us into standing down from reporting what is happening on the ground. After being targeted for doing just that, I am grateful for what our lawsuit has achieved in defending the rights of journalists to report free from government officials’ scrutiny.”
Cahana said: “My biggest fear is that other journalists may have avoided important stories out of fear of being targeted themselves. Press freedom is not a partisan issue. Everyone should be alarmed when journalists are targeted.”
Photojournalists sue DHS, agencies after questioned about caravan coverage
Freelance photojournalist Mark Abramson and four other photojournalists filed a lawsuit against the heads of the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Nov. 20, 2019.
The plaintiffs were each questioned by CBP officers from November 2018 to January 2019 about their work covering the Central American migrant caravan’s arrival to Mexico. In March 2019, it was revealed that DHS officials in San Diego had created a database of journalists, activists and attorneys who were involved in some way with the migrant caravan. At least three of the plaintiffs were listed in the database.
“This lawsuit challenges U.S. border officers’ questioning of journalists about their work documenting conditions at the U.S.-Mexico border,” the suit begins. “The border officers’ questioning aimed at uncovering Plaintiffs’ sources of information and their observations as journalists was unconstitutional.”
The suit seeks a ruling that such questioning violates the First Amendment and an injunction requiring the agencies to expunge any records or files about the photojournalists. The suit remains ongoing as of January 2022 and discovery is underway.
Mark Abramson, a freelance photojournalist, was pulled into secondary screening by U.S. border officials while returning from Mexico on Jan. 5, 2019.
Abramson, a U.S. citizen, told the Committee to Protect Journalists that border agents looked through his belongings, including his notebook, at the El Chaparral port of entry at San Diego, California.
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection official then brought Abramson into a separate room, where he was asked to leave his bag and phone behind. The Intercept reported that in there, he was questioned for about 30 minutes about assignments and payments he received as a freelancer. The official also asked a series of questions related to the migrant caravan, including whether Abramson knew “who is stirring up stuff in the camp” or of groups helping the migrants.
Abramson told CPJ he was disturbed by the line of questions. “I’m not an informant, my job is to inform the public,” he said.
CBP did not respond to a request for comment.
The U.S. Press Freedom Tracker catalogs press freedom violations in the United States. Email tips to [email protected].